Monday, April 19, 2010

Upcoming crim pro arguments before the Hawaii Supreme Court

Oral argument schedule, No. 29130- Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 10 a.m.
Petitioner argues that the ICA gravely erred in holding that the police adequately apprised Petitioner of his constitutional rights and that Petitioner validly waived these rights when the police told Petitioner at the time his Miranda rights were read and waived that they would be questioning Petitioner about one particular crime but subsequently questioned Petitioner on three other crimes.
An interesting question, especially for the criminal defense bar. But, if it's like any of my appeals in the queue, it could be a long, long time before there's a resolution.

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think there is a case on point, maybe 1990. Roberson v. Arizona __U.S. _____.